This is just a preview

Society is crumbling; rationality is tittering on the verge of extinction and the archaic capitalistic theocracy is starting to build a sense of totalitarian nationalism as it systematically dumbs down America through its continual indoctrination. The utilitarian notions propagated by the elitist masters (both democrat and republican) equate morality with their own senses of egoist righteousness and spread this mental plague across the land using their constructs of race, gender and religion to control the impoverished and undereducated masses, while they pilfer our pockets, start unjustifiable wars, and oppress those who are perceived as minority groups. IN other words they bend us over a table and fuck us every which way.

Well I say no more, no more treasonous acts, no more irrational motives, no more indoctrination of the youth and no more propagated rhetoric from those who are suppose to hold journalistic integrity.

To the point, the two party systems are going to get a shock because a new party is emerging steeped in philosophy, reason, poetics and other noble humanities. Social workers, teachers, and strong libertines are going to lead this party and attempt to rid the system of its obvious and inherent flaws by reconstructing the system as we know it.

Back to the republic! Join the Moralist party

I fucken got turned down for the fine print again.......The first time was right after 9/11 and apparently poetry about what pants you were wearing on the day of 9/11 was more profound then an indepth look at alice in wonderland trying to wash away the filth of wonderland which is a repersentation of her childhood molestation, now I got turned down with an informal letter stating that there are many reasons to turn down items one of them being quaility..... This is the one that got turned down...


Remembrance of Life

Inherently serendipitous one fathoms the realms of possibility,

Avert the trepidations of common societal regression,

Remain steadfast, locked in internal circumspection



The responsibility of man—

To find sagaciousness on its own through arduous, time-lorn journeys

Remember to find



That which lies dormant, submerged in the eyes of an elder

Live accordingly, subaqueous in the seas of memory,

Lest our names themselves be forgotten,

Graying at the end of personal possibility

As long as sexual relations are complicated by religious, social and financial considerations, so long will they cause all kinds of cowardly, dishonourable and disgusting behaviour. When war conditions imposed artificial restraint on the sister appetite of hunger, decent citizens began to develop all kinds of loathsome trickery. Men and women will never behave worthily as long as current morality interferes with the legitimate satisfaction of physiological needs. Nature always avenges herself on those who insult her. The individual is not to blame for the crime and insanity which are the explosions consequent on the clogging of the safety valve. The fault lies with the engineer. At the present moment, society is blowing up in larger or smaller spots all over the world, because it has failed to develop a system by which all its members can be adequately nourished, without conflict and the waste products eliminated without discomfort."
- Aleister Crowley

It seems today I have to school some people, so for all of those who think Jacob is a werewolf, well your wrong and Meyer is an Idiot. There is a huge difference although they have the same beginning which is the word lycanthrope from the Greek man-wolf. There are legends of the were-beasts dating back to Mesopotamia but the Greeks put a real name to it.

Fast-forward within the realms of Europe, the were aspect of the lycan, or should I say the anthromorphic aspect (walks on two legs , talks ect) was given super strength, great speeds, and the ability to procreate on the full moon because that is when the beast inside the man can no longer contain itself. Because it is a separate species and a cross species it was not intended to procreate naturally thus its zombie like plague spreading through scratches and bites. It takes extreme measures to kill a were beasts, complete dismemberment, beheading, have to completely burn them and the purity of silver but only through the heart and no where else. Natural enemy of the vampire, living dead versus embodiments of nature.

The lycan (Jacob from twilight) is a culmination of the Greeks shape shifter and Native American mythology shape shifters. The Lycan can transform into a wolf, it is both beast and man but not a combination of both, it is one or the other. It has the abilities of a man when it is a man, and it has the ability of a wolf when it is a wolf. It has no anthromorphic design and it breeds normally as a man and passes the ability on through its genetics that is it that is all. You can kill a shape shifter as easily as a man.

There is a difference; they are not the same thing and clearly JACOB IS NOT A WEREWOLF

In defense of Kantian Metaphysics in face of the Heisenberg uncertainty Principal



My Teacher:

In the first part, I presented the claim that the Critique of Pure Reason is shaped by the language of Newtonian physics, namely that the experienced world is an independent world made of “objects” (the notion of “object” is a metaphysical assumption of Newton, and so is the notion that such a world exists independently of our experience). Accordingly, Newtonian physics describes the movement of “objects” mathematically in time and space.
Similarly, in the Transcendental Aesthetic, like the assumptions of Newtonian physics, Kant demonstrates that empirical intuition is a representation in time / space (presented to us by the a priori intuitions or forms of time and space). Kant’s commitment to Newtonian physics becomes obvious when his theory is no longer applicable in Quantum Physics. This limited applicability can be seen in the following example: Can a subatomic particle such as an electron be considered an empirical intuition? And therefore as an “object” of experience?
The answer to this question for Kant and Kantians will not be a straight “YES” or “NO” because the framework of the critique is unable to explain why the electron is intuited differently from other empirical intuitions, such as a tree (while the location of an electron at a certain time cannot be determined, as is the case with some experiments in quantum physics, the location of a tree can be determined (see Heisenberg uncertainty principle).
The answer to the above Kantian dilemma can only be consistent with the above-mentioned claim that Kant’s philosophy of science, including his theory of experience, is a custom-designed theory of experience based on the metaphysical assumptions of the Newtonian. What appears to be the case is that the physicist’s choice of constructing certain conditions for an experiment based on his conceptual understanding of reality influences what will be intuited empirically at the end (uncertainty principle), and therefore, the Newtonian / Kantian notion that an electron as an object of experience exists independently from the experiencing subject or observer is no longer defensible.


ME:

First, one has to understand the concepts of the two separating constructs, Kant and Quantum Physics. Kant Died in 1804 and the electron was not discovered in till 1897 by JJ Thomson; thusly, the quantum world did not exist for Kant, as it did not for anyone else during his life time. As for Newton who died in 1727 only 77 years before Kant’s death, his knowledge would have been known. If one follows this understanding they would realize that it would have been impossibility for one such as Kant to evaluate and analyze the given situation, when the world changes so do our perceptions and understandings of it of it with the exception of mathematics, and that may one day be untrue as well. This is not the argument of a relativist, it is “truth” based on the knowledge gained through perceived factual information. The world according to scientists was once flat; our knowledge of the world changed and therefore so did our perceptions of it.

If one were to follow the Socratic understanding upon such constructs as that which is perceived as knowledge, they would understand the relevance to such idealistic concepts such as the philosophy of perception. As an Epistemological Idealist Kant insisted to a certain degree that anything that can be known for certain are just ideas, in other words abstractions. The philosophy of perceptions discusses how the mental process and symbolism are dependent on the intrinsic and extrinsic understanding of the perceiver. Focusing on the external world, for that is what is in our current discussion, ones individual perception of the world begins with the senses, and in other words we speak before we sing. This in-turn leads an individual to generate empirical concepts representing the world around us, relating of course to the learning of new concepts and then stacking the already gathered observational data on top of preexisting notions. In other words the realists are semi-correct in their assumption of absolute existence; however, what Kant and other idealists are following is the idea of knowledge from a Socratic sense of knowledge, stating that the object was always there, however, our perceptions give it meaning, such as a name, learning what it does. Does anyone really believe that when man first appeared, it looked up and “said that’s a tree.” As I stated previously as we gather more data, our preconceived notions change, our knowledge of perceptual information grows and therefore the objects of one’s observations change as well. In other words “The only knowledge I have is that I know nothing at all”

Still I have to disagree to a certain extent with the last decree. As you know I am a moralist, and oddly my own philosophy is growing into a mixture of three very unlikely philosophies, Kant being a part of that. The object known as the electron is a perceptual or observational conundrum. The velocity and the position of such an object, according to Heisenberg cannot be known simultaneously however they can be known separately. The position of the particle, or object within our universe is regarded as being where the wave amplitude is at its greatest. The position is uncertain only to the degree to the spread of this particular aspect of the wave. So in other words you find the wave, the object is there, in other words a yes; However, the position disappears once one begins to focus on the speed, so the answer would then be no.

When one is given the fact Kant Died before quantum physics and the fact that an electron for instance is an empirical institution when looking at its position and not one when looking at its speed; moreover, that our notions of such things change as the knowledge of this particular field expands, one can reach the conclusion that Kant can neither be dismissed from this subject as being unjustifiable in this particular realm of understanding nor does it dismiss the fact our notions do shape the world around it based on preconceptions of any given factual information given unto us at any given time.
This is why I like ethics a little more than classical logic and metaphysics.