deviant ART

[x]

A time for Change by ~poetOflore:iconpoetOflore:



Edward Zeauskas

For the news paper

A time for Change


It is about time that the American people stood up and used their rights to start an intellectual revolution. A revolution does not necessarily mean hatred, war, or violence. It can mean simply challenging the status quo.
It was during Lincoln’s first inaugural that he stated “this country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right of dismembering it”
The revolution I speak of is one based on critical thinking that leads to common sense morality. I think in order to do so, we as a people must change our ideas of what is considered moral. Now morality at its core is simply actions taken in order to prevent or stop pain and suffering and the embracing of human rights as dictated through logic.
The morals within our society are based on an outdated sense of capitalism and the Judeo-Christian ethics of history. These outdate concepts throughout history have “not only accommodated itself to but has justified slavery, war and almost every other human exploitation of what ever status quo happened to prevail. Our society has deemed good dependent on the variable of whether we want it or not.”- Taken from Rules for Radicals, by Saul D. Alinsky
As a first step we can start this journey, this revolution of ideals, this want of change with the basic fundamentals of free speech and human rights. There is a “controversial” cause that is happening around us at all times. The right for gay marriage, the “underground” prejudice shown against those labeled as homosexual within the confines of our society is not only appalling but immoral in of itself, and this lack of human rights is based on the ideals of the current status quo. Just because rules and regulations make some people happy does not make them morally justified.
According to Kant’s categorical imperative in its simplest form; do unto others as you would want done to you. You should not lie, because you do not want anyone lying to you. You should not steal because you want no one to steal from you.  This is basic common sense, so why than do people not stand up for the rights of everyone if they were in the same situation they would want others to stand up for them. Why are those labeled “homosexual” denied the same rights as those labeled “heterosexual” do we not all deserve the same treatment? Are we not all created equal? Are we not all “human”, if you know the answer than ask yourself what is the moral justification behind not legalizing gay marriage?
If we as a people, united by just causes as is the embodiment of the American spirit were to stand up for the rights of all than all will stand up for the rights of everyone. There is a difference between the way the world is and the way it ought to be and it takes a united effort to turn it into what it ought to be. Slowly through the years it has been happening and now it is our turn, it is our generation’s time to make a difference. As was stated through history “an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere.” Let us start this intellectual and moralistic revolution by correcting this injustice and stating that gay marriage must be legalized based on common sense, logic, morality and the principles of human rights.
©2008 ~poetOflore
Details
Submitted: April 21
File Size: 3.6 KB
Image Size: 0 bytes
Resolution: 0×0
Comments: 10
Favourites & Collections: 3 [who?]

Views
Total: 29
Today: 0

Downloads
Total: 2
Today: 0

Thumb

Author's Comments

Writing this for my school paper

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 2 2 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

~animegirlfroggy:iconanimegirlfroggy: Apr 22, 2008, 7:34:43 AM
I like it, you really do have the ability to move and inspire people. What you said about people outing gays, is how I tried to explain it to that it's just like when people were shunned for marrying interracially. If forbidding interracial marrages is wrong forbidding gay and lesbian marrages should be just as wrong. I think you say it in a smarter sense though.

--
"I dance to music that no one else can here. The movements are my own."

My Girl -> ~DragonSlaveDragoon
My Stock Account -> ~AngelicLizardStock

Stop putting fake statistics in your signature. It's annoying and they are FAKE.
~poetOflore:iconpoetOflore: Apr 24, 2008, 5:13:01 AM Mood: Joy
yeah, you are comepletly correct on your assumptions, it should be legalized and i hadnt even thought of the interacial aspect till now, so thank you!

--
To read is to live, so Read or die !!!!!!!
~animegirlfroggy:iconanimegirlfroggy: Apr 25, 2008, 8:00:38 AM
your welcome! ^^

--
"I dance to music that no one else can here. The movements are my own."

My Girl -> ~DragonSlaveDragoon
My Stock Account -> ~AngelicLizardStock

Stop putting fake statistics in your signature. It's annoying and they are FAKE.
~Tiki-Rongo:iconTiki-Rongo: Apr 30, 2008, 6:58:24 PM
very good buddy i agree with you in the fact that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality but there is one point i would like you to ponder:

Now, there is supposed to be a separation of church and state within America, however marriage is a solely religious concept that two people are joined together in "holy matrimony" and therefore if marriage is a religious ceremony how is it possible, or right, at all that marriage of any kind, whether gay or straight, be made legal or illegal when in reality, marriage is a question for the church to handle in what they consider right or wrong. Now me i personally find myself in conflict with religion and church on many many things because it is intolerant as well as, to me, a complete insult to human morality and intelligence so in many ways it is the religion itself that needs to be reevaluated and the question of marriage should never come into political or legal play at all.

just some ponderings of my own on the subject that i think are kinda interesting considering the giant paradox that we come into when marriage at all becomes any part of the law or politics.

--
7/7/06 - the day half my heart died...
The only chains I don't want to break, are those that hold me to your love.
~poetOflore:iconpoetOflore: May 1, 2008, 5:57:43 AM
The answer to your question is in your question. Matrimony is within the church marriage on the other hand is a state function, people often use the word to mean the same thing but they are two differnt functions.

And i agree with you on the second part i know many of my gay freinds who are deeply relgious and understand that who they are is not wrong in any deitys eyes, just the eyes of people.

--
To read is to live, so Read or die !!!!!!!
~Tiki-Rongo:iconTiki-Rongo: May 5, 2008, 6:54:39 PM
very true much like the difference between divorce and annulment with one technically being between the state and the other with the church respectively .. either way though the basic concept that the state should have nothing to do with marriage at all whether gay or straight is still the way i feel on the subject but then again i dont think the state should be involved in a lot of things that it is now being since "government big enough to provide everything you need is big enough to take everything away" to loosely quote thomas jefferson of course lol.

--
7/7/06 - the day half my heart died...
The only chains I don't want to break, are those that hold me to your love.
~poetOflore:iconpoetOflore: May 6, 2008, 6:34:41 AM
yeah we do need a goverment but we dont need bias leadership

--
To read is to live, so Read or die !!!!!!!
~Tiki-Rongo:iconTiki-Rongo: May 7, 2008, 10:50:27 AM
exactly... which leads me to the question of ya think you would vote for me later on when i can run for president? lol

--
7/7/06 - the day half my heart died...
The only chains I don't want to break, are those that hold me to your love.
~poetOflore:iconpoetOflore: May 9, 2008, 4:24:06 AM Mood: Joy
lol it is better than a republican

--
To read is to live, so Read or die !!!!!!!